A Shocking Big Character Poster
There were new posters every day, inside and outside the auditorium, around several buildingsand in the corridors. Colleagues’ posters also appeared in batches, some of them against me andfocused on the usual two points, nothing new. I gradually became numb.However, one day, a new poster scared me:Look at the Ugly Face of Zeng Qing Si
1. Zeng Qing Si said: "In (19) 62, the Guangdong – Hong Kong border was suddenly open forthree days*, people swarmed to Hong Kong along the Canton Kowloon Railway and roads andwaterway." - Did you want to disseminate rumors so as to slander socialism?
2. Zeng Qing Si said, he rarely watched movies, because the domestic films always followed the same pattern, when you saw the beginning, you knew the end; and those (imported) Hong Kong filmswere either weeping or noisy, and were worth nothing to watch. - Why did you so viciously slander the domestic films and the progressive films of Hong Kong?
3. Please look at Zeng Qing Si’s marriage attitude: Several colleagues had introduced girls to him, but were rejected. Prior to his marriage with the counterrevolutionary, the Party branch leaders had repeatedly advised him, but he insisted on. Why are you so loyal to the counterrevolutionary, what is the ideological base? If you are not wearing together a pair of pants, what else?
This Poster aroused a big uproar. Numerous posters with scolding, abuse and intimidation ensued with overwhelming effect!
I knew the most destructive was the first one - the so-called "open border" rumor. That crime of "fabricating rumor" alone could cause my arrest. Before long a colleague who used to gossip was handcuffed in the assembly and escorted away because he had "spread a lot of rumors.” The open border event was well known not only in the Guangdong area, but also in Shanghai and Beijing. Many people learning the news went into action without delay. In Yunnan, a remote province, the news was blocked, and people who did hear it regarded it as a fable like Arabian Nights. Teacher Liu who wrote this poster was also Cantonese and had family members in Hong Kong and many classmates and friends in Guangzhou. So how could he not hear anything about the event? I lamented this ruthless political campaign that so distorted our humanity. However, I could not defend by myself. The more I explained the worse things became. Nothing could I do but wait with heavy heart. When would I be handcuffed and escorted to the police jeep andtaken away?
–------------------------------------------------------
* In May 1962 during the so-called "three years of natural disasters" the Great Famine, the Guangdong–Hong Kong border had three days of "Big Opening" (as people so called it) or "Great Fleeing to Hong Kong": The authorities let the people freely go to Hong Kong. Usually a special exit permit or a border pass was needed to buy a ticket to the border city of Shenzhen, and that was available only in a few metropolitan cities, but during those days tickets were sold openly without any document. Not only the Guangzhou Railway Station had a rough-and-tumble, but also in Shanghai and Beijing many people rushed to buy a ticket. A friend of mine happened to be on a business trip to Beijing; he bought a train ticket to Shenzhen and successfully crossed the border to Hong Kong. Most people could not buy train tickets, so they used up other means: cars, bicycles, boats, walking or swimming. Along the Canton Kowloon Railway and other roads and waterways, crowds of people swarmed like ants to Hong Kong. According to the statistics of the British Hong Kong authority, more than 60,000 people arrived in Hong Kong within three days, and more than 40,000 were intercepted at the border by Hong Kong patrols and were sent back to the mainland. How many people had arrived in
Shenzhen but not yet crossed the border and were sent back? Nobody knew. Why did this weird thing happen? It was said that a VIP of the Communist Party said with full self-confidence, "Let a few people who are discontented with socialism go out, it’s nothin remarkable.” But soon he saw the huge exodus and immediately closed the border. According to domestic official records, there were at least four instances of a Great Fleeing to Hong Kong: 1957, 1962, 1972, and 1979. In addition to 1962 mentioned above, the number was the highest in 1979: 119,000 went to Shenzhen, but only 29,000 successfully arrived at Hong Kong. Since the blockade of the border in 1950 to the beginning of reform and opening up in the early 1980s, more than one million people have successfully fled into Hong Kong, accounting for one-third of Hong Kong's population. (See "Baidu" website; and Chen Bing-an: “Great Fleeing to Hong Kong". Guangdong People's Publishing House, 2010)
--------------------------------------------------------
Despite my apprehensions, this "rumor" event was never mentioned again and disappeared entirely from the scene. It seemed that the authority knew it was true and did not want to spread the hype. In fact, I had only talked with Liu privately four years previously. Now it became known to everybody that the one blamed for "disseminating rumor" should be him instead of me. Anyway, this was one among thousands of posters which hurt me deeply. Later, another colleague Teacher Li who used to be on good terms with me said to me, "The Party branch had asked me several times to write posters against you. I had to cope with that, but I would not write such kind of posters." Nevertheless, I understood that Liu had acted only under great pressure. Years later Liu sought my goodwill and I did not hold this against him. Criticized, Denounced and Sent to Labor The Party branch leader ordered me to write self-confession based on the "exposed" data from the posters, then to accept criticism and denunciation at the Department’s political studying session. Yet even with arbitrarily distorted and hearsay “evidences,” al
exposed data were around the usual two points, and "criticism and denouncement"
just repeated the words from the newspaper. Later, when there still was really nothing new, they excerpted some sentences from fragmentary records of what I
had spoken at the weekly Department political studying sessions. They added distortions and exaggerations to criticize and denounce me. I was resentful and helpless but felt I must be cooperative and deal with it carefully. Every day brought political studying, writing Big Character Posters, or reading other posters. In addition, there were assemblies of denunciation and struggle against objects at different scales ranging from the Party branch group to the whole college. At the time of writing Big Character Posters, I also had to write, so I racked my brains to come up with trifling things to include. It had to be done very carefully, or otherwise any petty mistake would be seized upon as a crime. Not only writing Big Character Posters, any utterance and other doings must also be cautious, because they could trump up a charge on any pretext. Once when we were in the auditorium to listen to a report from one of the authorities, one person carelessly spread a newspaper to cover the dirty, long wooden bench and sat down. At that time, the daily newspapers always had a large portrait of Mao on the front page. So that was a horrible blunder! The man was charged with “Pressing Chairman Mao under his buttocks,” and was pushed to the stage right away to accept criticism and denunciation. Once another "activist" learned that there were plaster busts of Mao on sale. To show his "loyalty,” he intentionally clamored to b y one quickly. Then he tied Mao’s plaster bust on his back with a rope and returned. But he unexpectedly was seen by others, he was charged with "tying Chairman Mao up with a rope,” and was criticized and denounced on-site. Considering
e was one of the "five red categories,” they only punished him by kneeling in front of the college gate for two hours. The faculty, staff and students of the Medical College went to the countryside to help harvest. I was assigned to a squad of students whom I had taught. They no longer showed me respect and care as
before, but also no hostility or trouble. Anyway, we all felt uncomfortable. During the break, we had nothing to chat about. To evade the embarrassment, I took to the latrine for my refuge. The local rural latrine was a small open-air pit surrounded by straw mats with flies fluttering and dung maggots crawling. Once I felt a bit cold and clammy on the ankle, then found a dung maggot crawling on it. It made me sick. I quickly picked up a leaf and wiped it off. Nevertheless, I preferred to squat on the latrine until starting work again. Once I had just come out from the pit and met a student. He nodded slightly to me and stood courteously on the side of the path to let me pass. I felt a bit of relief: The goodness of human nature was not annihilated. In addition to being criticized and denounced, sometimes I and other "cow demons and snake spirits" were ordered to do penal labor, such as mowing, removing rubbish mounds, cleaning the environment, etc. In fact, we were only besieged by the Big Character Poster, or were abused as "cow demons and snake spirits,” but had never been publicly convicted as "guilty,” or labeled as "elements.” However, without any basis in law or any formal procedure we still had to accept criticism and denunciation, be ransacked, or do penal labor. It had been decided internally by the authority that we were the objects of dictatorship (namely, enemies). When and how would we the "cow demons and snake spirits" next be punished? Of what "elements" would we be labeled? The menace was like a sword hanging over my head. I was in a constant state of anxiety, suffering from insomnia, dizziness and low appetite. I went to the college infirmary for blood pressure measurement: 132/90, i.e., 132 systolic and 90 diastolic. I knew it was not diagnosed hypertension according to the standard at that time. Dr. Chen glanced at me sympathetically but didn't say anything
and gave me a few days of tranquilizers. The First Ransack One day when we were in the Department political studying session learning about the editorial views of the "People's Daily,” a female teacher accompanied by the student's squad leader came in and whispered with the head, then commanded me to go out with them. Outside the door, she ordered that we go to my dorm for "sweeping four old" - a synonym for ransack. I followed them helplessly, followed by colleagues. When I was approaching the dormitory, a group of students were waiting there. They shouted slogans: "Sweep all the cow demons and snake spirits!” "Leniency to tho e who confess, severity to those who resist." I was ordered to bow my head
and hand over keys and all other items from my pockets for inspection. Then the teacher and students went in to ransack. There were more than 30 yuan in a drawer - the remainder of my monthly salary after buying meal tickets. The teacher instructed the students to give it back to me. This was a small discipline retained in the early days of the Cultural Revolution, or else I might have had no money to buy meal tickets. As a poor teaching assistant, how many belongings I might possess? Ransack finished, the teacher asked me: "Where about the diary?" I replied, "I don't write a diary." I knew the danger of a diary. Over the years of one after another political campaign, many people got into trouble and even lost their lives just because of a diary. Before long a colleague was shot because "a lot of reactionary remarks" were found in his diary. The teacher continued, holding a stack of my letters from abroad and asked: "Where are other
letters?" I answered, "All the letters from abroad are here. As for domestic letters, I discarded them after reading.” Actually, even letters from abroad I didn't want to keep, just to avoid possible charges of "Having illicit relationship with foreigners,” but I had kept them for verification and now it really counted. It also made me realize that "overseas relationship" was an important item for ransacking. In fact, it was known to all that all letters from abroad or Hong Kong and even some domestic letters were secretly inspected by the public security, the so-called "going into the dark room." If there were any problem in my letters, it would have gotten me into trouble already, so there was no need to
check again by them. Six cans of malted milk powder which I bought the day before were placed in a row on the desk, the teacher asked me: "Why did you buy so many?" I answered: "My child is just one year old, her mother’s milk is insufficient, and she cannot buy milk or milk powder in Guangzhou. The day before yesterday I saw malted milk powder on sale here, so I bought them to send back home."
This child, my daughter, was born in the second year of our marriage. I still had to work in Kunming, while my wife Yu-ou remained in Guangzhou. Alone, she faced the difficulties of pregnancy, childbirth, infant care and feeding. When she most needed support and care, I could not help, to my deep and lasting regret. In those days, the supply of consumer goods nationwide was very limited. In
Kunming, occasionally I could buy food for mother and child which I would send back to Guangzhou. This time I had only bought the malted milk powder and hadn't yet sent it before the ransack. I was really worried about it being confiscated. The face of my little daughter waiting to be fed appeared in my brain. ......
The teacher's husband was acquainted with me. With leniency, she told the studets to put malted milk powder back on the bookshelf. Later when I talked about this matter with friends, they said it was such only at the early days of the Cultural Revolution. Later the raids became more and more crazy. Anything the Red Guards wanted could be taken away, or walls and floors torn up, and even people were beaten half-dead. Ransack finished, my things taken away included: all photos, letters from abroad, a book, "Selected Songs in English and Chinese," and a few foreign language learning books (all bought from Xinhua Bookstore) and a new book, "The Sunzi Art of War With Annotations," published by Ancient Book Publishing House recently. They promised these things would be returned to me after inspection but actually were gone forever. I was very sorry for losing those photos: from infancy to the following years including family, friends and classmates, which were collected in a small album, all were gone. Our family photos in Guangzhou also were ransacked and lost because of my father's religious belief and overseas relationship, plus his status as a senior intellectual of the "stinking ninth category." My mother was a devout Catholic alleged “superstitious to intoxicated” by the Religious Affairs officers. So after 17 years when I went to the United States Consulate for applying an immigrant visa, I was not able to provide even a single family photo. Fortunately, the consulate officer understood, asked no more questions, and gave me the visa. The next day after my ransack, th Party branch leader asked me: "Don’t you have religious items?"
"Last summer I took them back to Guangzhou.” I replied. By now I realized that "religious items" was one of the major goals for the ransack, and the reasons for the besiege by the Big Character Poster - Catholic, and overseas relationship - were glaringly obvious. A Pleasant Surprise I was unable to protect myself, but I was also worried about the situations of my wife and my parents, especially my wife. As a "released counterrevolutionary,” she might be thrown to the bottom of a political hell at any time. My daughter little Meng was just one year old and learning to walk. How was she now? I also feared great difficulty for my Catholic parents because my father, as a